Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Michael and his wife Mary on the Questions and Answers programme, where he gave account of the horrific abuse he had suffered. RTÉ

Opinion Michael O'Brien's intervention was a watershed moment in our reckoning with abuse

Dr Sinéad Ring of Maynooth University says Ireland owes a huge debt of gratitute to Michael O’Brien, survivor of abuse, who passed away this week.

THE HEADLINES THIS week focus on the death of Pope Francis in Rome. But here in Ireland we have lost another influential figure, a man committed to justice and truth.

Michael O’Brien made a significant contribution to our collective knowledge about the effects of sexual violence against children and the harmful effects of the state bodies created to respond to survivors of institutional abuse.

Mr O’Brien created one of the most powerful moments in Irish public life when he shared his experience of being raped as a child in St Joseph’s Industrial School in Clonmel. In May 2009, in an unplanned intervention, he spoke from the audience on RTÉ’s Questions and Answers programme.

MunsterAtheist / YouTube

On the panel that evening were Minister for the Environment Noel Dempsey and Leo Varadkar, then in opposition. The topic was the recent Report of the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse

Extending over 2,600 pages, it painted a devastating picture of violence against children in the industrial school system. It found that sexual abuse was endemic in boys’ schools and that physical and emotional abuse and neglect were pervasive across the system.

Sexual abuse was hidden by the congregations and abusive men were transferred to other schools where they re-offended. It found that abusers were able to operate undetected for long periods, and even if detected, religious authorities seldom reported sexual abuse.

john-kelly-an-abuse-victim-reads-a-copy-of-the-commission-to-inquire-into-child-abuse-in-dublin-ireland-may-wednesday-may-20-2009-a-fiercely-debated-nine-year-investigation-into-irelands John Kelly, an abuse victim, reads a copy of the 'Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse' in Dublin, Ireland, May, Wednesday, May 20 2009. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo

The Department of Education was found to have dismissed or ignored complaints of sexual abuse. In an especially damning finding, the Commission described the Department’s inspection system as “fundamentally flawed and incapable of being effective”, blaming its “deferential and submissive attitude […] towards Congregations”.

A country wakes up

The media reaction was one of horror. The Irish Times called it “a map of an Irish hell”. But survivors’ voices did not feature prominently in the public discussion; indeed, they were banned from attending the launch. It was in this context that Michael O’Brien’s contribution should be understood.

Seated next to his beloved wife Mary, Mr O’Brien spoke powerfully and without shame:

Eight of us from the one family, dragged by the ISPCC cruelty man.
Put into two cars, brought to the court in Clonmel.
Left standing there without food or anything, and the fella in the long black frock and the white collar came along, and he put us into a van …
Two nights later I was raped.

In these lines, Mr O’Brien indicted the State, in the form of the courts, and by implication the law, which authorised the abduction of children from their families and their incarceration on various grounds, including poverty and being a female victim of sexual violence.

He went on to describe the crimes he endured at the hands of men in Ferryhouse Industrial School, piercing the decades of imposed societal silencing of him and other survivors.

Mr O’Brien went further and called on the State to account for its failures towards survivors. He described the adversarial approach to truth-finding adopted by the Commission, including how he was cross-examined by eight different lawyers as he gave testimony over five days.

He described feelings of utter devastation after giving testimony. This was the first time that a survivor had spoken so publicly and so clearly about the harms inflicted by the State’s responses to adult survivors.

Lifting others up

Mr O’Brien’s intervention was a watershed moment in Irish society’s reckoning with our shared history of institutional abuse. A few weeks later, he was one of four survivors who led a silent march of around 10,000 people in solidarity with abuse survivors. The Dáil held a two day debate on the Report. Survivors met President McAleese in Áras an Uachtaráin, where she called for criminal prosecutions.

Regrettably, that was not achieved; only three prosecutions resulted from referrals from the Commission.

members-of-a-government-appointed-commission-to-inquire-into-child-abuse-addresses-the-media-during-a-press-conference-in-dublin-ireland-wednesday-may-20-2009-a-fiercely-debated-long-delayed-inv Members of a government-appointed Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse addressed the media in 2009. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo

Mr O’Brien’s message was the right of every person to tell their story and the need for society to learn from their experiences. But, crucially, there was and is a major barrier preventing many survivors from speaking. People who accepted an award from the Redress Board were required to sign an agreement promising not to talk about their experience of redress.

They were also sent a letter quoting legislation criminalising the publication of information that could lead to the identification of a person or institution. Punishment for breach was — and is — a fine of €25,000 and two years’ imprisonment. The same law also bans publication of information provided by religious orders to the Board, thus impeding our knowledge of our shared past.

These bans could easily be repealed by the Oireachtas. Other concrete actions would also make a difference, like enhanced medical cards for survivors, many of whom are living with lifelong conditions and disabilities connected with their experiences in industrial schools.

Action by Minister for Education, Helen McEntee and the government on these practical and simple steps would be a fitting tribute to Mr O’Brien.

Dr Sinéad Ring is an Associate Professor at the School of Law and Criminology, Maynooth University.

If you have been affected by any of the issues mentioned in this article, you can reach out for support through the following helplines. These organisations also put people in touch with long-term supports:
  • One in Four on 01 662 4070
  • Samaritans 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org
  • Text About It - text HELLO to 50808 (mental health issues)
  • Aware 1800 80 48 48 (depression, anxiety)
  • Pieta House 1800 247 247 or text HELP to 51444 – (suicide, self-harm)
  • Teen-Line Ireland 1800 833 634 (for ages 13 to 19)
  • Childline 1800 66 66 66 (for under 18s)

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds